Effects of Pre-Hatch Thermal Programming on Internal Organ Development of Crossbred Chickens in The First Week Post-Hatch

Authors

  • Faizal Andri Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran, Ketawanggede, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145
  • Filoza Marwi Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran, Ketawanggede, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145
  • Ani Atul Arif Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran, Ketawanggede, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145
  • Edhy Sudjarwo Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Brawijaya, Jl. Veteran, Ketawanggede, Kec. Lowokwaru, Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2024.025.02.10

Keywords:

Heat Stress, heart, incubation temperature, liver, poultry

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of pre-hatch thermal programming on internal organ development of crossbred chickens in the first week post-hatch. A total of 200 fertile eggs from a crossbreed of male local chickens and commercial laying hens were used in this study. The average egg weight was 62.76 ± 4.40 g with a coefficient of variation was 7.01%. The eggs were randomly distributed into four treatment groups, each with five replicates (10 eggs per replicate). The treatments were T0: standard incubation maintained at 37.50°C throughout the entire incubation period (control); T1: standard incubation with a 6-hour daily increase to 38.50°C from days 10-18, T2: standard incubation with a 6-hour daily increase to 39.50°C from days 10-18, and T3: standard incubation with a 6-hour daily increase to 40.50°C from days 10-18. After hatch, the chicks were reared for a week and evaluated for internal organ development. The results showed that there were no significant differences among treatments (P>0.05) for all measured variables, including the absolute weights (g) and relative percentages (%) of the internal organ. The absolute weight of the heart, liver, proventriculus, gizzard, and intestine were ranged from 0.69 to 0.84, 2.68 to 2.93, 0.74 to 0.87, 6.48 to 7.05, and 7.94 to 8.42 g, respectively. Whereas, the relative weight of the heart, liver, proventriculus, gizzard, and intestine were ranged from 0.89 to 1.12, 3.46 to 3.79, 0.95 to 1.13, 8.29 to 9.11, 10.24 to 10.82%, respectively. It could be concluded that pre-hatch thermal programming can be considered a safe strategy without compromising internal organ development of crossbred chickens in the early post-hatch period.

References

Abdel-Fattah, S. A., Madkour, M., Hemida, M. A., & Shourrap, M. (2024). Growth performance, histological and physiological responses of heat-stressed broilers in response to short periods of incubation during egg storage and thermal conditioning. Scientific Reports, 14, 94. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-50295-x

Al Amaz, S., Chaudhary, A., Mahato, P. L., Jha, R., & Mishra, B. (2024). Pre-hatch thermal manipulation of embryos and post-hatch baicalein supplementation mitigated heat stress in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 15, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00966-6

Andri, F., Marwi, F., Nurwahyuni, E., Yulianti, D. L., Setyo, H., Prayogi, H. S., & Sudjarwo, E. (2023). Effects of egg storage duration prior to incubation on performances of Arab Chickens during the first week post-hatch. BIO Web of Conferences, 81, p. 00045. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20238100045

Chen, C. Y., Lin, H. Y., Chen, Y. W., Ko, Y. J., Liu, Y. J., Chen, Y. H., Walzem, R. L., & Chen, S. E. (2017). Obesity-associated cardiac pathogenesis in broiler breeder hens: Pathological adaption of cardiac hypertrophy. Poultry Science, 96(7), 2428-2437. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex015

Costa, B. T. A., Lopes, T. S. B., Mesquita, M. A., Lara, L. J. C., & Araújo, I. C. S. (2020). Thermal manipulations of birds during embryogenesis. World's Poultry Science Journal, 76(4), 843-851. https://doi.org/10.1080/00439339.2020.1823302

Dung, H. T., Chao, N. V., Hoa, N. T., Phung, L. D., Na, T. T., Thuy, N. T., Thao, T. N., & Hung, P. H. S. (2024). Effects of heat stress on histomorphology and tight junction genes expression in the cecum of broiler chickens. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 12(1): 56-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.1.56.61

Goel, A., Ncho, C. M., Gupta, V., & Choi, Y. (2023). Embryonic modulation through thermal manipulation and in ovo feeding to develop heat tolerance in chickens. Animal Nutrition, 13, 150-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2023.01.005

Iraqi, E., Hady, A. A., Elsayed, N., Khalil, H., El-Saadany, A., & El-Sabrout, K. (2024). Effect of thermal manipulation on embryonic development, hatching process, and chick quality under heat-stress conditions. Poultry Science, 103(1), 103257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103257

Kim, E., Morgan, N. K., Moss, A. F., Li, L., Ader, P., & Choct, M. (2022). Characterisation of undigested components throughout the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens fed either a wheat- or maize-based diet. Animal Nutrition, 8, 153-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2021.09.011

Kim, H., Ryu, C., Lee, S., Cho, J., & Kang, H. (2024). Effects of heat stress on the laying performance, egg quality, and physiological response of laying hens. Animals, 14(7), 1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071076

Mangan, M. & Siwek, M. (2023). Strategies to combat heat stress in poultry production-A review. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 108(3), 576-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13916

Ravindran, V., & Abdollahi, M. R. (2021). Nutrition and digestive physiology of the broiler chick: state of the art and outlook. Animals, 11(10), 2795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11102795

Rocchi, A. J., Santamaria, J. M., Beck, C. N., Sales, M. A., Hargis, B. M., Tellez-Isaias, G., & Erf, G. F. (2023). The immuno-suppressive effects of cyclic, environmental heat stress in broiler chickens: local and systemic inflammatory responses to an intradermal injection of lipopolysaccharide. Veterinary Sciences, 11(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci11010016

Scholey, D., Marshall, A. H., & Cowan, A. A. (2020). Evaluation of oats with varying hull inclusion in broiler diets up to 35 days. Poultry Science, 99(5), 2566-2572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.043

Sumantri, C., Khaerunnisa, I., & Gunawan, A. (2020). The genetic quality improvement of native and local chickens to increase production and meat quality in order to build the Indonesian chicken industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 492, p. 012099. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/492/1/012099

Tamzil, M. H., Noor, R. R., Hardjosworo, P. S., Manalu, W., & Sumantri, C. (2013). Acute heat stress responses of three lines of chickens with different heat shock protein (HSP)-70 genotypes. International Journal of Poultry Science, 12(5), 264-272. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2013.264.272

Wang, Y., Wang, X., & Li, Q. (2023). Aflatoxin B1 in poultry liver: Toxic mechanism. Toxicon, 233, 107262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2023.107262

Yang, G., Zhou, X., Chen, S., Liu, A., Liu, L., Wang, H., Wang, Q., & Lan, X. (2024). Effects of heat stress and lipopolysaccharides on gene expression in chicken immune cells. Animals, 14(4), 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14040532

Yulianti, D. L., Prayogi, H. S., Hamiyanti, A. A., Nurwahyuni, E., Andri, F., & Marwi, F. (2023). Manajemen Breeding dan Penetasan Unggas. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press. https://doi.org/10.11594/ubpress9786232968646

Zhang, H., Pertiwi, H., Majdeddin, M., & Michiels, J. (2024). Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1 inhibition alleviates intestinal impairment induced by chronic heat stress in finisher broilers. Poultry Science, 103(1), 103252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.103252

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Andri, F., Marwi, F., Arif, A. A., & Sudjarwo, E. (2024). Effects of Pre-Hatch Thermal Programming on Internal Organ Development of Crossbred Chickens in The First Week Post-Hatch. TERNAK TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Animal Production, 25(2), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2024.025.02.10