The Reject Green Kale Substitution (Ipomoea Aquatica) Fermented Yeast in Commercial Feed on Performance and Carcass Quality of Super Native Chicken

Authors

  • Alberth Nugrahadi Ndun Animal Husbandry Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Nusa Cendana University, St.. Adisucipto New Campus of Penfui, Kupang 85001, Indonesia
  • Franky M. S. Telupere Animal Husbandry Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Nusa Cendana University, St.. Adisucipto New Campus of Penfui, Kupang 85001, Indonesia
  • Ni Gusti Ayu Mulyantini Animal Husbandry Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Nusa Cendana University, St.. Adisucipto New Campus of Penfui, Kupang 85001, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2020.021.01.1

Keywords:

Native chicken, green kale, fermentation, performance, carcass

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the reject green kale effect of substitution fermented yeast in commercial feed on the performance and carcass quality of super native chicken. The design of this study is a completely randomized design (CRD) factorial pattern 2 x 4. The first factor is gender, the second factor is 4 treatment of feed. Each treatment consisted of 4 replications, and each test consisted of 4 chickens. The treatment in question is: R0 = (100%) basal ration without the reject green kale substitution (Control), R1 = 95% basal ration + with the reject green kale substitution fermented yeast 5%, R2 = 90% basal ration + with the reject green kale substitution fermented yeast 10%, R3 = 85% basal ration + with the reject green kale substitution fermented yeast 15%. Conclusion the reject green kale substitution fermented yeast in commercial feed can improve the performance and carcass quality of super native chicken. The best performance results were obtained from the value of feed consumption in male R3 treatment at 455.6 grams/head/week, body weight gain/week in male R3 treatment at 295.5 grams/head/week, feed conversion in male R2 treatment at 1,538, and carcass percentage at male R3 treatment by 62.6%. While the best results of carcass quality obtained from the value of the water holding capacity is the treatment of male R1 by 53.83%, cooking losses in the treatment of R3 female by 12.63%, the potential hydrogen of the male R2 treatment by 5.07%, and tenderness which is at the highest favorite level in the treatment of treatment. Male R3 is 3.53%.

References

Daud, M., & Zulfan, Y. M. (2015). The Use of The Green Kale (Ipomoea Aquatica) Probiotic Fermentation in Rations Against Peking Duck Performance. Proceedings of the 2015 National Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology.

Domiszewski, Z., Bienkiewicz, G., & Plust, D. (2011). Effects of different heat treatments on lipid quality of striped catfish (Pangasius hypophthalmus). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria, 10(3), 359–373.

Husmaini. (2000). Effect of increased protein and ration energy levels when refeeding on the performance of free-range chickens. Journal of Animal Husbandry and Environment, 6(1).

Lacy, M., & Vest, L. (2000). Improving feed conversion in broiler: a guide for growers.

Lapase, O. A., Gumilar, J., & Tanwiriah, W. (2016). Kualitas fisik (daya ikat air, susut masak, dan keempukan) daging paha ayam sentul akibat lama perebusan. Students E-Journal, 5(4), 1–7

Lawrie, R. (2003). Meat Science (Aminuddin’s (ed.); 5th ed.). University of Indonesia Publisher.

Merthayasa, J., Suada, I., & Agustina, K. (2015). Daya ikat air, pH, warna, bau dan tekstur daging sapi bali dan daging wagyu. Indonesia Medicus Veterinus, 4(1), 16–24.

Munira, S., Nafiu, L., & A.M, T. (2015). Super kampung chicken performance on feed substituted by fermented rice bran with different fermenters. JITRO, 3(2).

Nataamijaya, A. G. (2016). Karakteristik dan produktivitas ayam kedu hitam. Buletin Plasma Nutfah, 14(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.21082/blpn.v14n2.2008.p85-89

Nurcholis, Hastuti, D., & Sutiono, B. (2009). Management of layer laying laying chickens in the popular farm of kuncen village, mijen district, Semarang City. MEDIAGRO, 5(2).

Prasetyo, & Kendriyanto. (2010). Quality of Fresh Beef and Lamb Stored in Cold Temperature with Liquid Smoke Preservatives. National Seminar on Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Technology.

Pratama, A., Suradi, K., Balia, Roostita l, Chairunnisa, H., Lengkey, Hendronoto Aw, Sutardjo, D. S., Suryaningsih, L., Gumilar, J., Wulandari, E., & Putranto, W. S. (2015). Evaluasi karakteristik sifat fisik karkas ayam broiler berdasarkan bobot badan hidup. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak, 15(2), 61–64.

Prayitno, A. H., Edi, S., & Zuprizal. (2010). Physical and sensory quality of meat of broiler chicken fed with the addition of virgin coconut oil waste. Bulletin of Animal Science, 34(1), 55–63.

Rivai, F. (2001). Growth of Kampung Chickens, Pelung and Pelung Crosses of First Descendant Kampung (F1) Age 5-12 Weeks. Bogor Agricultural University.

Rumiyani, T., Wihandoyo, & Sidadolog, J. H. P. (2012). Pengaruh pemberian pakan pengisi pada ayam broiler umur 22-28 hari terhadap pertumbuhan, dan kandungan lemak karkas dan daging. Buletin Peternakan, 35(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v35i1.589

Soeparno. (1998). Meat Science And Technology. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soeparno. (2005). Meat Science and Technology (4th ed.). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soeparno. (2009). Meat Science and Technology (6th ed.). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Soeparno. (2011). Science of Nutrition for Meat Nutrition. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Steel, R. G., & Torrie, J. (1995). Statistics Principles and Procedures (B. Sumantri (ed.); 2nd ed.). Gramedia.

Winarso, D. (2003). Perubahan karakteristik fisik akibat perbedaan umur, macam otot, kombinasi waktu dan temperatur perebusan pada daging ayam kampung. Indonesian Trop Anim Agric, 28(3), 119–132.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-04

How to Cite

Ndun, A. N., Telupere, F. M. S., & Mulyantini, N. G. A. (2020). The Reject Green Kale Substitution (Ipomoea Aquatica) Fermented Yeast in Commercial Feed on Performance and Carcass Quality of Super Native Chicken. TERNAK TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Animal Production, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jtapro.2020.021.01.1

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2020): TERNAK TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Animal Production

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access, http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html).